Tolerate the good, don"t tolerate the bad but make allowances.
This blog is a collection of thoughts and observations of Andis Kaulins. Being an anti-blog, it will not allow the posting of comments. Anyone who agrees with what Andis thinks, disagrees with what Andis thinks, or wants to start a correspondence with Andis, is welcome to email Andis at andiskaulins@qq.com
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Travel
To traveling inwards expands ones mind as much as traveling outwards.
To look under your bed is just as fantastic a journey as to travel to Mars.
Grain of Sand
"All the world in a grain of sand; all the universe too. "
It is commonly known that no matter how big something is, there will always be something bigger. That is, we think of infinity as being very, very big.
But do we think about how small something is, there will always be something smaller? That is, we can never get to the smallest thing; everything is divisible?
Infinity goes both ways.
One thing is always infinitely bigger than nothing.
To create infinity, all that has to be done is to create a grain of sand.
Friday, August 23, 2013
What is the Aim of Life?
Maybe it is simple: to be good. But if that is the aim, why is it so? What is the compelling reason to be good?
This question of compelling reasons raises another question. Can we be good without compulsion? We can try but why put ourselves out if there is no reason to?
Very simply I say that there has to be a reason, and all creatures needs compulsion to be good; and thus incentives matter.
A Prayer
Please allow others to do better and get more than I do.
All I ask is that my getting less is a matter of indifference to me.
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Pain
Pain is opportunity saying grasp me! And the louder it shouts, the bigger the prize.
Pain is how you get out of yourself.
Pain is how you get out of yourself.
Saturday, August 17, 2013
To Discriminate or Not
A polygamist tries to get a hotel room for himself and his three wives. The owner of the hotel is a avowed homosexual and married.
Could the owner not give the polygamist a room because of the illegality of the relationship?
A man brings his dog, which he says is his spouse to the same hotel. What should the owner do?
Take me to another age! Please!
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Firing All the Incompetents
If I fired all the incompetents, I would be left with but one incompetent: me!
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Overlooking Something
Try as I might to think of all the bad things that could be said about me, I always overlook something...
Sunday, August 11, 2013
To Judge or Not to Judge?
I
will begin this essay with these five quotes:
- Judge not, ye be judged. The line from the Bible often used by people who don't believe in the Bible.
- I hate Christians! They are so judgmental! I can't attribute this quote to anyone in particular for I have heard it so often. The last time I heard someone say this was on a radio phone-in show I was listening to via podcast.
- Judge not, ye be judged judgmental. Writer Florence King's take on people using the line from the Bible to support that their contention that it is bad to be judgmental – the modern sin.
- They say you shouldn't be judgmental. Well, I say I am fucking judging! Comedian Adam Carolla during a rant about the irresponsibility of parents whose children are on public school lunch and breakfast programs.
- "One sin I have never had to confess is that I judged anybody." Mother Teresa.
The
following encapsulate all the thoughts I can think of about judging.
I agree with three out of the five. My initial instincts are not to
agree with Quotes #2 and #5.
Quote
#2 is easy to dismiss because it is illogical. In saying other
people are judgmental, you are making a logical error, because saying
someone is judgmental is a judgment and thus being judgmental. Yes,
it is judgmental to say someone else is judgmental.
Easily
dismissed as you can see, but to be fair, I will try to restate what
the many people who say Quote #2 in fact mean. Basically, they
disagree with the judgments that Christians make. Fine and Dandy to
say so, but the question of whether their basis for making judgments
is correct or not is beyond that scope of this essay, though I will
admit that I find myself to be more and more in agreement with the
judgments Christians make.
But
then how is it that I disagree with Quote #5 which is attributed to
Mother Teresa? As I said, my instinct would be to disagree with
Quote #5. If you asked what I would have said if I didn't know that
quote #5 was made by Mother Teresa, I am pretty sure I would have
said that quote #5 was balderdash and was probably made by someone
who was anti-Christian. How can you not go through life without
judging? I would have said and I would have had an accompanying
visceral thrill talking like Adam Carolla in quote number #4. I
would further have added that the meaning of quote #1 was that if
you judge, you must expect that you will be judged yourself, not that
you shouldn't judge. And of course, you should operate at a high
moral level to be more qualified to judge, but that doesn't mean that
your judgment is necessarily wrong. For as clocks are right twice a
day, children can see obvious things that adults can't, and we can
agree with fools if they happen to be right, we can judge, as long as
we are willing to accept the consequences.
Still,
I can't disagree with a Saint and go along with a shock jock. I will
have to think through my thoughts on judging in light of the Mother
Teresa quote.
So!
Here I go! Catholics like to say they have the truth on their side.
That is, like the great biblical prophets who shouted the truth,
Catholics, like Mother Teresa, are supposed to do the same.
Catholics also talk of love, and how we must love others. The truth
should be said with love.
Now,
we live in an era where saying the simple truths can get one in
trouble and even get one accused of being judgmental. Adam Carolla
is right to say that there is something wrong with parents having to
rely on the public school system to feed their children – parents
who do are clearly abdicating their responsibilities and really don't
love their children. Likewise, Mother Teresa was right to oppose
abortion – it is clearly murder of the innocent. Both of Carolla
and the Mother would clearly
anger some constituency by telling their truths.
But
then I must continue on about Carolla. He is a wealthy man who feels
that his wealth and his life experiences give him the right to judge
others. He does get all holier-than-thou at times, and I believe he
is an atheist. He respects hard work and enterprise, which is fine,
but he also worships money, and sees it as a pulpit from which he can
preach. He will lambast people, judging them as it were, for the
pettiest of reasons like on a podcast of his I recently listened to
where he discussed encountering a woman who proudly boasted to him
that she had a '68 Mustang that she had driven since 1968 and had
driven it over 800,000 miles. Why, he said, would he, who owned so
many nice cars, want to listen to someone who had a very common car?
He mentioned that other people with him at the time were rolling
their eyes acknowledging that the woman was slightly monomaniacal
bonkers – I suppose this justified making fun of the lady on his
show.
Come
on! I would say to Carolla. Be nice in the spirit of Mother Teresa!
(Though I am sure he would lambast me with many rejoinders that I
couldn't quickly respond to.) Clearly there is something not quite
right about Carolla's manner of judging. Now that I think about it,
he uses the fact of his correct judgments as a means of justifying
his mean-spirited ones. And what I suppose initially appealed to me
about his judging those delinquent parents so much was that it was
unrestrained. We love to just let ourselves screech without guilt,
to be loudly and proudly self-righteous. Sometimes, I wish I could
be that way, but I so aware of my own failings and weaknesses, and
can never forget my pathetic moments and inconsistencies, as well as
the fact that I have a small bank account.
So
here I am judging Carolla, as I try show that he is a fucking
douchebag in comparison to Mother Teresa!
Maybe
I should just try to tell the stories of these two people, and just
let the stories speak for themselves.
So!
To judge or not to judge? Be careful is all I say. Be a
truth-teller without destroying anyone personally.
That
was to be the essay till I came upon the following aphorism by Don
Colcaho, a.k.a.
Nicolás Gómez Dávila. The South
American sage said the following:
To
judge correctly, one must lack principles.
What
the heck does that mean? And do I agree with it? It is paradoxical
in the Chesterton way, so that leads me to think it must be true.
One could argue that Adam Carolla is proof, but let me try to figure
out what it means.
Principles,
when it comes to behavior, when had, may in fact cause us to act in
ways that are against our earthly interests. The principle of
admitting we are wrong or that we erred may cause one to lost face
and social advantage. How many times have you seen politicians do
everything but admit they screwed up? e.g. the Clintons. Well that
couple seems to have earned many an advantage and the wife may even
become president herself. They took cover and saved their political
asses by correctly pointing out that the other side, the Republicans,
were seeking political advantage from their troubles. They judged
correctly but didn't resign as a principled person in their shoes
should have.
Thinking
about this, I see how Mother Teresa was correct in her not judging.
She could have walked away from many a dying person living in the
gutter and said they lived dissolute lives and deserved their fate,
but she didn't judge and followed her principle of Loving the person.
But
can everyone be a Saint and not judge? I am afraid not. As Colacho
implies, it is better to have principles and make incorrect
judgments. Love, to employ the cliché, is blind and thus will make
all sorts of wrong judgments. The world looked at in a stark light
is a place teeming with guilt and sin, and it would be so easy to
take advantage of that fact for our earthly advancement.
I
conclude by saying that I haven't solved the problem of making
judgments for myself and any rare reader who has bothered to read
this essay from start to here. Alas, it is paradox that only Love
can transcend.
The Worst Thing
There is one thing worst than getting what one wants.
That is getting what one wants served to them on a silver platter.